Identity theft has been on the forefront during this
legislative session. Several bills have been
considered so far. Some have failed to pass but
progress is still being made.
The identity theft bills that have been considered, so
far are:
SB05-137 - Identity Theft Security
Freezes
Sponsors: Senator Grossman,
Representatives Paccione and Frangas
This bill has become known as the "security freeze"
bill because it allows any consumer who wants to do
so to put a security freeze on his or her credit
report. The security freeze would then keep a
potential creditor from accessing the credit report
until or unless the freeze is lifted by the consumer. A
consumer does not already have to be a victim of
identity theft to place a security freeze on his or her
report.
Security freezes can be especially effective for
stopping the type of identity theft where a criminal
obtains your personal information and uses it to open
new credit accounts. With a security freeze, you
would lift the freeze long enough to apply for the
credit you need and you would be assured that
nobody is opening accounts in your name. If a credit
reporting agency inadvertently releases your
information, they would be required to notify you.
Another benefit of this bill that is the protection it
could offer to vulnerable populations such as seniors
and the disabled.
This bill is very close to being passed. As of this
writing, this bill has passed a Senate Committee, the
Appropriations Committee, House Committee and
second reading in the House.
Read this bill
Consumers United Association urges our members
to contact your Representatives in support of this
bill.
Bill sponsor contact information:
Sen. Dan Grossman (Denver & Jefferson) - 303-866-
4852
Rep. Angela Paccione (Larimer) - 303-866-2917
Rep. K. Jerry Frangas (Denver) - 303-866-2954
Identity theft bills that did not
pass
House Bill 1226
Sponsored by Representative Frangas and Senator
Grossman would have helped to criminalize using a
false identity to gain personal information over the
Internet and stealing personal information from trash
receptacles. The bill also had provisions for
businesses to protect personal information.
House Bill 1116
Sponsored by
Representative Crane would have added applying for
a government document under false identity to the
crime of criminal impersonation. It would have made
identity theft a class 4 felony.
Unfortunately, neither of these bills passed out of the
appropriations committee. By increasing the felony
level of the crime or adding new crimes under the
umbrella of identity theft, there would have been
added costs to the state for law enforcement, court
systems and jails. The appropriations committee
determined the state budget could not support
this.
We commend Representative Crane who has
attempted to pass similar legislation before and we
hope he will continue to try. We also thank
Representative Frangas and Senator Grossman who
have been working very hard at trying to pass
meaningful identity theft legislation.